"No Shoes, No Shirt, No Service": Restaurants Have Standards - Do Republicans?
Nation will be watching on Caucus Night as Iowa Republicans Provide an Answer
The latest round of indictments against Donald Trump - 37 federal indictments, including 31 for violating the federal Espionage Act - has implications for the 2024 Iowa Republican Precint Caucuses.
They will now do a lot more than simply pick a winner in the first official contest as the party begins its presidential nominating process. They will provide the first answer from Republican voters to an increasingly urgent and vital question: Does the Republican Party have meaningful, minimum standards for who it is willing to nominate for President of the United States?
Does character count? Loyalty to America and to democracy? Competence? Is being a skilled problem solver still an asset? Or is it enough for Republicans these days for its leaders to simply seethe with grievance, mostly imagined? Is it necessary to obey the law?
Donald Trump is the most disgraced president in the history of America. As he retains his front-runner status in the race for the Republican presidential nomination - nationally and in Iowa - the answers to those questions become increasingly important.
Iowa Republicans will be among the first in the nation to begin providing answers to those questions at their first in the nation presidential precinct caucus next year.
They need to begin thinking now about their answer to the “standards” question, as much they think about the question of which candidate they will choose that night.
They also need to be aware of the pressing need to get the answer right. They have a responsibility to the country and to the future of their own party to get it right.
The eyes of the nation will be on Iowa Republicans, waiting to hear their answer.
Consider the resume Republican front runner Donald Trump now brings to the contest:
impeached twice;
court ordered to pay $5 million for sexual abuse, for which he was found civilly liable.
34 state criminal indictments in connection with hush money payments to a porn star shortly after his wife gave birth to their new son;.
37 federal criminal indictments - including 31 charges for violating the federal Espionage Act, betraying his country, his county’s allies, and military and intelligence personnel who put their lives on the line daily to protect our nation and our safety.
Not exactly the resume Abraham Lincoln, General Dwight Eisenhower, Ronald Reagan, or even Mitt Romney brought to their presidential campaigns, is it?
The truly pitiful part of all this is that Trump’s list above might well be just the beginning. At least two more grand juries are out there meeting - one in Georgia and one in Washington, D.C. - both of which are likely to return even more indictments on the even bigger issue of attempting to over throw the free and fair election of 2020 - the ultimate attack on our democracy.
America wants to know:
Does a sad, tawdry and disgusting resume of indictments and court ordered payments totaling millions of dollars, like Trump’s, disqualify someone from even basic consideration as a presidential nominee?
Or does it rate instead “no problem.”
More specifically, is Trump’s pathetic past a non-starter? A nightmare? Or the “new normal” for Republicans?
Iowa Republicans didn’t volunteer to be among the first to officially answer the “standards” question, but Iowa’s first in the nation caucus status and recent events have combined to give them that responsibility.
It is no doubt a heavy responsibility for some - but they should welcome it because they now have the opportunity to return the bar to where it belongs: a place that requires integrity, ethical and lawful behavior, and loyalty to America and to democracy, as well as the ability to actually solve real problems.
Republicans need to think about that question, deeply.
They need to decide whether they are going to be a party with or without basic minimum standards for their presidential nominee, before they choose their nominee. Knowing the answer to the “standards” question is really a prerequisite for choosing a candidate. How else do you know whether the candidate you have chosen meets those standards?
For decades, Iowa caucus attenders have proudly told the nation about the care and deliberation we bring to the decisions we make in our first in the nation caucuses. We have reassured others that Iowa can be trusted to go first because the state takes its early vetting responsibility very seriously.
On Caucus Night 2024, the decisions Iowa Republicans make will demonstrate whether those claims are accurate, or whether, instead, we are merely “legends in our own minds” on that score.
Let’s face it. If the standards Iowa Republicans set by their choice on Caucus Night are standards that allow Trump, or any candidate with his train wreck of a resume through the gate - then there really are no standards.
That’s no way to choose a president.
What’s it going to be Iowa Republicans? Time tested standards of character, integrity, competence, and loyalty to America and democracy?
Or an eagerness to embrace ethical train wrecks?
Iowa, the rest of the nation and the world is watching.
Below are links to the columns offered by the Iowa Writers Collaborative (IWC), which links some of Iowa’s best thinkers and writers directly with readers. Like “Barry Piatt on Politics: Behind the Curtains,” all columns are reader supported. Your paid subscriptions help make these columns possible and help shine a light on issues important to Iowans and others.
Please consider supporting our work with a paid or free subscription.
Laura Belin: Iowa Politics with Laura Belin, Windsor Heights
Doug Burns: The Iowa Mercury, Carroll
Dave Busiek: Dave Busiek on Media, Des Moines
Art Cullen: Art Cullen’s Notebook, Storm Lake
Suzanna de Baca Dispatches from the Heartland, Huxley
Debra Engle: A Whole New World, Madison County
Julie Gammack: Julie Gammack’s Iowa Potluck, Des Moines and Okoboji
Joe Geha: Fern and Joe, Ames
Jody Gifford: Benign Inspiration, West Des Moines
Nik Heftman: The Seven Times, Los Angeles and Iowa
Beth Hoffman: In the Dirt, Lovilla
Dana James: New Black Iowa, Des Moines
Pat Kinney: View from Cedar Valley, Waterloo
Fern Kupfer: Fern and Joe, Ames
Robert Leonard: Deep Midwest: Politics and Culture, Bussey
Tar Macias: Hola Iowa, Iowa
Kurt Meyer, Showing Up, St. Ansgar
Wini Moranville, Wini’s Food Stories, Des Moines
Kyle Munson, Kyle Munson’s Main Street, Des Moines
Jane Nguyen, The Asian Iowan, West Des Moines
John Naughton: My Life, in Color, Des Moines
Chuck Offenburger: Iowa Boy Chuck Offenburger, Jefferson and Des Moines
Barry Piatt: Piatt on Politic Behind the Curtain, Washington, D.C.
Macey Spensley: The Midwest Creative, Iowa
Larry Stone: Listening to the Land, Elkader
Mary Swander: Mary Swander’s Buggy Land, Kalona
Mary Swander: Mary Swander’s Emerging Voices, Kalona
Cheryl Tevis: Unfinished Business, Boone County
Ed Tibbetts: Along the Mississippi, Davenport
Teresa Zilk: Talking Good, Des Moines
To receive a weekly roundup of all Iowa Writers’ Collaborative columnists, sign up here (free): ROUNDUP COLUMN
We are proud to have an alliance with Iowa Capital Dispatch
Is it too much to ask for our president to simply be a decent human being?
Excellent tee-up for the Republican surviving caucus, worthy of tacking on the bulletin board for frequent review. But the practical disqualifier is that he can't win the general election thus accelerating the Iowa GOP's descent into political malpractice on the national stage much as the D's have done statewide which has enabled the current Iowa Statehouse excesses.
But don't get me started!